This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 at and is filed under Videos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Humor: Republicans Attempt To Explain Sarah Palin's Foreign Policy Experience
Loading...
IMPORTANT :: YOU MUST SAVE THE FILE AS ".FLV"
Change the file name from "get_video" to "video.flv"
Tags: alaska, bounds, brown, campbell, cindy, doocy, experience, foreign, george, mccain, palin, policy, russia, sarah, stephanopoulos, steve, tucker,
Comments to “Humor: Republicans Attempt To Explain Sarah Palin's Foreign Policy Experience”
Leave a Reply
January 7th, 2009 at 15:38:12 I'll vote for you.
January 7th, 2009 at 16:01:11 Gotcha interview techniques? Is that the only explanation you have for Tucker Bounds not having an answer to the most basic of questions? I don't know how basic you like your questions to be but it leads me to one of my own... are you retarded?
January 7th, 2009 at 16:24:10 That Campbell Brown and her gotcha interview techniques. Clearly another example of the left tricking those real americans into inserting foot to mouth.
January 7th, 2009 at 16:47:09 haha I live close to the white house, I should be president :)
January 7th, 2009 at 17:10:08 lol, nice vid.
January 7th, 2009 at 17:33:07 Yo, it's easy to blame the last 8 years on the party. But to be honest, a lot of the mistakes that were made have been learned from, and most of them were from the Bush administration. What I'm saying is that you shouldn't just vote for a candidate because of his (or her) party, especially if that decision is based upon how the party "as a whole" has functioned for the last 2 terms. Look into the candidates' political and legislative histories, bias aside, & guess how each will govern the US.
January 7th, 2009 at 17:56:06 Yeah, i'm sorry too, but the last eight years hasn't filled me with confidence for the people in charge of republican policies. I'm not painting everyone with the same brush here though. There are obvious exceptions to the rule on both sides. I infact think McCain would have been a far better president than Bush could ever be but on this occasion, i can only see that Obama being president was the best choice for the USA.
January 7th, 2009 at 18:19:05 I'm sorry you decided to segment the parties on a moral basis. All I can say is that there are serious problems with the Fed, republicans and democrats alike, especially that deal with greed and behind-the-curtain dealings. I believe that democrats want good inherently just like republicans do, but their methods for creating a "better" world are fantastical and unrealistic. Republicans inherently want good, but can't see that some regulation is needed when it comes to rich CEOs! Bahh.
January 7th, 2009 at 18:42:04 No, choice A was republican and choice B was democrat. This time it was the right choice purely because Obama was on the side of the democrats. Democrats = on the side of humanity, not on the side of the top 1% richest people in the world, war mongerers and reckless and catastrophic environmental policies for the acquisition of wealth. Republicans seem hell-bent on making policies based upon greed and not for the betterment of the general population.
January 7th, 2009 at 19:05:03 Oh, shoot... I'm sorry, I didn't know you were an idiot. First off, I didn't vote for Bush. Second, just because choice A was bad, doesn't mean choice B is better - A = Bush B = Obama. All I'm saying is don't glorify him; don't put all your faith in him, just like people shouldn't have with Bush. Think for yourself.
January 7th, 2009 at 19:28:02 Bush also offered change and change is what you got. He took the US bank and turned credit into a defecit of almost 10 trillion dollars. Yup. TEN TRILLION DOLLARS. That is over a trillion dollars a year lost. If that is good government management then you need to learn economics FAST. You guys voted that idiot in. You tried to defend him for so long but eventually you had to concede - he fucked you guys and got rich in the process. Time for someone else. Time for Obama.
January 7th, 2009 at 19:51:01 johns wife is hot...like a porn star?
January 7th, 2009 at 20:14:00 hahahah well put
January 7th, 2009 at 20:36:59 wow i live close to a hospital -- i must be qualified to perform brain surgery :> !!
January 7th, 2009 at 20:59:58 this tucker guy reminds me of the squeeky voiced teen on the simpsons. he makes me wanna vomit.
January 7th, 2009 at 21:22:57 he wasn't asked to compare Palin with Obama, he was asked for a reason or example why she is supposedly more qualified in foreign relations than Obama, and he had nothing just like Palin. at least he didn't say; well she lives next to Canada and she can see Russia from her window, LOL
January 7th, 2009 at 21:45:56 okay, well I have taken a look, and it doesn't sound like you have. Obama doesn't has withheld nearly all of his legislation history, giving light to the fact that he might have possibly been a part of NO significant legislation at all. Doesn't sound like a leader to me- more like a grand deceiver. Seriously, just because someone offers change doesn't mean that they don't have their own agenda. Be careful of this man Obama.
January 7th, 2009 at 22:08:55 if u take a look at obama policies u can see where the change is, and take a look at mcain u can see where change isn't..
January 7th, 2009 at 22:31:54 Why do democrats pretend Obama is going to bring about change, and then try to find reasons why McCain and Palin will not? You seriously glorify Obama, the one who IS running for president, even though his track record is PATHETIC. Hope you're content; you won't be in a year or so.
January 7th, 2009 at 22:54:53 First of all Palin doesn't have more experience than Obama. He has been in public office for 12 years. Palin was a mayor of small town that populated 9000 people and managed to leave them in dept. Explain to me how is she more prepared to be president than Obama?
January 7th, 2009 at 23:17:52 bbellcamp here's the funny thing. If Obama had Sarah Palin's educational background and she his, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
January 8th, 2009 at 23:40:51 Maj. Allen Herritage, a spokesman for the Alaska region of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, at Elmendorf Air Force Base. To be very clear, there has not been any incursion in U.S. airspace in recent years, Herritage said.
January 8th, 2009 at 00:03:50 dude he doesnt say anything about foreign policy experience, she did not even know what the Bush Doctrine was!
January 8th, 2009 at 00:26:49 will americans sleep well at Night knowing Sarah Palin is a heartbeat away from the most powerful office in the WORLD? True, you never vote for a VP but surely the choice of Palin as a running mate speaks more about McCains judgement than anything else?
January 8th, 2009 at 00:49:48 If you listen to what he is saying, you will realize that what he's giving the best answer that he can.. Sarah Palin really does have more experience overall than Obama. If this is such an important ground for decision, why then, support Obama, and not McCain/Palin?